<FOOLISH FOUR PORTFOLIO>
J.P. Morgan Jumps
And part 2 of our look at Caterpillar
by Chris Rugaber (TMF [email protected])
Alexandria, VA (March 11, 1999) -- Today I'd like to tie up a few loose ends and then continue with our look at Caterpillar's <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE: CAT)") else Response.Write("(NYSE: CAT)") end if %> income statement and what it tells us about the company, which we began last week.
First, those Foolish Four investors who ended up with DuPont <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE: DD)") else Response.Write("(NYSE: DD)") end if %> as one of their stocks are finally benefiting from a recent 10% jump in the company's stock. DuPont has had a rough year, but its recent announcement about a new life sciences tracking stock has been well received. For the full story, check yesterday's Lunchtime News.
J.P. Morgan <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE: JPM)") else Response.Write("(NYSE: JPM)") end if %>, America's fourth-largest bank, has also been zipping along for the past few days. In fact, the Foolish Four has done pretty well of late and is ahead of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index for the year. This hasn't prevented all negative coverage of the Foolish Four, however. Check out the discussion on our message boards about a recent negative article in Kiplinger's, and especially what I posted about my conversation with Kiplinger's reporter.
Anyway, even the Foolish Four portfolio I purchased on January 8th, which turned out to be the same as our online real-money portfolio (though mostly at higher prices), is ahead of the S&P from that date. By the way, the reason I know this is because of a feature on our portfolio page: enter the stocks you purchased and the date you bought them, and our portfolio feature will tell you what the S&P has done since the date of your purchases. Pretty cool!
Back to J.P. Morgan. According to Bloomberg News, Morgan has been cruising upward as a result of improved "trading profits" and increased business advising corporate mergers. For example, Morgan advised Volvo <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(Nasdaq: VOLVY)") else Response.Write("(Nasdaq: VOLVY)") end if %> on its recent sale to Ford Motor Co. <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE: F)") else Response.Write("(NYSE: F)") end if %>. The "buzz" seems to be that Morgan's stock may be looking at sustained growth, as analysts raise estimates for future earnings and the rumors of a potential takeover persist (it must be noted that the rumors of J.P. Morgan being bought have been around for months). In fact, Bloomberg also speculates that Morgan itself may look to purchase a company or two, preferably "a money manager or brokerage," as this would provide "fee income" and other more reliable revenues. Apparently, Morgan is seen as too vulnerable to domestic and international market swings, making its earnings "volatile," and therefore making investors nervous. Morgan's stock had a volatile year in 1998 but is recovering and is up 13% for the year.
Turning to our best-performing company, let's look at Caterpillar's income statement. First, let me apologize for last week's error that many of you noticed: Caterpillar's 1997 and 1998 revenue numbers were transposed last Thursday and part of Friday morning, making it appear as if their revenue had declined from '97 to '98, even though I was writing as if it had increased. In fact, their revenues did increase, and the numbers are now correct in our archives.
Last week we looked at the differences between the company's revenues, which grew, and its profits and earnings per share, which did not. Let's take a fuller look at the income statement; specifically, operating margins and R&D costs.
This gives us a fuller picture than we had last week. Certainly, the 3.36% decline in gross margins that we see in the third line reflects pricing pressures from competitors and troubled economies abroad, which we discussed last time. Yet the 19.55% collapse in operating margins is the main reason Caterpillar's revenues increased but its profits declined in 1998.
(in millions 1997 1998 change Revenue $18,925 20,977 10.84% CoGS (Cost of Goods Sold) 13,374 15,031 12.39% Gross Margins 29.33% 28.35% -3.36% SG&A (Sales, General & Admin) 2,232 2,561 14.74% R&D (Research & Dev) 528 643 21.78% Operating Profit 2,430 2,253 -7.28% Operating Margins 12.84% 10.74% -19.55% Profit 1,665 1,513 -9.13% Profit Margins 8.80% 7.21% -18.02%
Today's Stock Lists | 1998 Dow Returns
03/11/99
Close
Stock Change Last -------------------- CAT +1 7/8 50.88 JPM + 5/16 119.19 MMM - 3/8 80.13 IP - 3/8 41.31 |
Day Month Year History FOOL-4 +0.79% 6.51% 7.59% 9.19% DJIA +1.27% 6.35% 7.95% 7.52% S&P 500 +0.84% 4.79% 5.89% 6.14% NASDAQ +0.25% 5.43% 10.01% 11.52% Rec'd # Security In At Now Change 12/24/98 24 Caterpillar 43.08 50.88 18.09% 12/24/98 9 JP Morgan 105.51 119.19 12.96% 12/24/98 14 3M 73.57 80.13 8.91% 12/24/98 22 Int'l Paper 43.55 41.31 -5.14% Rec'd # Security In At Value Change 12/24/98 24 Caterpillar 1034.00 1221.00 $187.00 12/24/98 9 JP Morgan 949.62 1072.69 $123.07 12/24/98 14 3M 1030.00 1121.75 $91.75 12/24/98 22 Int'l Paper 958.12 908.88 -$49.25 Dividends Received $15.04 Cash $28.26 TOTAL $4367.61 </FOOLISH FOUR PORTFOLIO> |