Fool FaceInvesting For Growth
The IFG Area, What You'll Find Here | The IFG Approach Explained | The Historic IFG
The Daily IFG Report


(FOOL GLOBAL WIRE)
by Robert Sheard (MF DowMan)

LEXINGTON, Ky. (Mar. 21) -- As amazing as it may seem, not a single story crossed the wires about the ten IFG stocks today, not even about Intel (which seems to show up in every story related in any way to technology).

So, I'll steal the chance to act the part of tour guide for the new area. Many of you have asked about the newer variations of IFG since the primer has been published. As of now, there are three that we're following regularly in the IFG folder (in the section of our boards called Let's Talk Investment Approaches).

The first is Mike Buckley's YPEG33 approach. Mike (MF Buck) decided to see what would happen if you threw a fundamental price valuation into the mix. For this version, you run a YPEG price target for each of the stocks on the IFG Focus List and then include only those that have at least 33% growth room above their current prices. You probably won't find ten stocks this way, but you may get some that are cheap.

The second variation is Todd Gunerman's. Todd developed a series of screens using the Telescan commercial software in order to emulate Value Line's criteria for their Timeliness rankings, an essential component of the Investing For Growth approach. Todd's method bypasses Value Line completely and tries to create a comparable approach to IFG by screening for the individual stock characteristics directly.

The third approach is my own variation on the original model, the IFG/RS (Relative Strength). The big complaint some people had with the original model is that Value Line's rankings aren't sensitive enough to a stock which started to collapse (the two which come to mind are U.S. Surgical in 1992 and Micron Technology over the last 4 months). The original model held these stocks way too long, giving back massive gains.

So, instead of using the Industry Ranking as the final screen (to get the momentum component of the model in there), the IFG/RS approach substitutes the Relative Strength ranking from Investor's Business Daily. You simply choose the ten IFG stocks with the highest RS rankings and then proceed as usual, updating every quarter.

We don't have a lot of data on the new variations yet, but each shows promise as an improvement over the original model. Join us in the IFG folder for weekly updates and continuous discussion of these variations. Fool on!

The Current IFG Stocks


Tellabs <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NASDAQ:TLAB)") else Response.Write("(NASDAQ:TLAB)") end if %>

Green Tree Financial <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE:GNT)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:GNT)") end if %>

United Healthcare <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE:UNH)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:UNH)") end if %>

PacifiCare Health <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NASDAQ:PHSYA)") else Response.Write("(NASDAQ:PHSYA)") end if %>

Checkpoint Systems <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE:CKP)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:CKP)") end if %>

Dionex <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NASDAQ:DNEX)") else Response.Write("(NASDAQ:DNEX)") end if %>

Medtronic <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NYSE:MDT)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:MDT)") end if %>

Stryker <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NASDAQ:STRY)") else Response.Write("(NASDAQ:STRY)") end if %>

Biomet <% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("(NASDAQ:BMET)") else Response.Write("(NASDAQ:BMET)") end if %>

Bio-Rad Labs (ASE:BIO/A)

Today's IFG Numbers
INVESTING FOR GROWTH (3/21/96)  

           Day    Week    Month  Year   History
IFG      -0.55%  -0.14%  -0.83%  1.13%  4014.28%
DJIA     -0.50%   0.75%   2.58%  9.96%   578.89%
S&P 500  -0.12%   1.21%   1.37%  5.40%   509.45%
NASDAQ   -0.18%   0.02%  -0.02%  4.53%   643.00%


Rec'd     #    Security       In At   Now    Change

10/10/94 9586  Micron Tech    16.63  32.63   96.24%
1/5/96   3387  Sterling Soft  52.75  69.38   31.52%
4/8/95   5828  ADC Telecom    28.38  36.50   28.63%
4/8/95   3794  Intel          43.56  55.88   28.26%
1/5/96   3183  Comp Assoc     56.13  70.38   25.39%
1/5/96   4168  Oracle         42.88  48.63   13.41%
1/5/96   2627  Comp Sci       68.00  70.88    4.23%
7/8/95   3866  Tellabs        48.00  49.00    2.08%
1/5/96   4229  Adobe Sys      42.25  34.25  -18.93%
7/8/95   3776  Applied Mat    49.13  36.31  -26.08%

Rec'd     #    Security           Cost        Value       Change

10/10/94 9586  Micron Tech    $159,367.25  $312,743.25  $153,376.00  
1/5/96   3387  Sterling Soft  $178,664.25  $234,973.13   $56,308.88  
4/8/95   5828  ADC Telecom    $165,369.50  $212,722.00   $47,352.50  
4/8/95   3794  Intel          $165,276.13  $211,989.75   $46,713.63  
1/5/96   3183  Comp Assoc     $178,645.88  $224,003.63   $45,357.75  
1/5/96   4168  Oracle         $178,703.00  $202,669.00   $23,966.00  
1/5/96   2627  Comp Sci       $178,636.00  $186,188.63    $7,552.63  
7/8/95   3866  Tellabs        $185,568.00  $189,434.00    $3,866.00  
1/5/96   4229  Adobe Sys      $178,675.25  $144,843.25  $(33,832.00) 
7/8/95   3776  Applied Mat    $185,496.00  $137,116.00  $(48,380.00) 

      CASH           $458.86       
      TOTAL    $2,057,141.49         


Transmitted: 3/21/96

Main
Page

Fool's
School

Hall of
Portfolios

Investing
Foolishly

Daily
News

Stock
Research

Foolish
Games
Copyright © 1996 The Motley Fool, Inc. All Rights Reserved.