Tuesday, March 17, 1998

The Daily Workshop Report
by Robert Sheard (TMF Sheard)

LEXINGTON, KY. (March 17, 1998) -- Jim Lynn (OGIM) has been doing some back-testing of ideas we've been tracking and discussing in the Workshop area. Today he finished a recent test for our Low Price/Sales screen from 1989 through 1997. Unfortunately, we didn't have the data for Jim to take this particular test back any further, but to let you know what Jim found in that brief period, here's a copy of his results. I'll let Jim speak for himself here. Please thank him when you have a chance for all the work he's put into our Workshop. -- Robert Sheard

Here's a Saint Patrick's Day present for everyone --

Robert has kindly used his Value Line database to select the top 10 stocks (year by year) for the PSR strategy (VL #1 timeliness stocks with Price/Sales Ratios below 1.5 and positive 1-year earnings growth, ranked by 26 week Total Returns/Relative Strength) which has done so well over the last two years.

Unfortunately, this strategy doesn't do so well in a back-test. Over the nine-year period, it has significantly lower returns and reward/risk ratios than the pure 26-week Relative Strength strategy. Curiously, the pure RS strategy is especially better than PSR in the weak market years of 1990 & 1994. (See below.)

However, by expanding PSR to include Value Line #2 stocks (just like Keystone) the returns and reward/risk ratios are much improved, yet still below 26-week RS.

Since the #1 ranked stock (highest 26 week total return) has negative returns, it has been removed in all three strategies.

      Five Stocks (#2 - #6) 
  
           RS  PSR1  PSR1&2  
  
 1989    43.1  10.2  63.2 
 1990    29.4   8.5   8.5 
 1991   109.8  53.8  59.1 
 1992    20.8  16.2  10.1 
 1993    55.8  31.0  26.6 
 1994    43.7   8.2  14.3 
 1995    59.6  42.9  42.9 
 1996    22.9  24.7  73.1 
 1997    70.3  74.9  78.3 
  
 CAGR    48.5% 28.3% 39.3% 
 Sharpe   1.649 1.047 1.328 
  
 Nine Stocks (#2 - #10) 
  
           RS  PSR1  PSR1&2  
  
 1989    46.7  11.0  60.8 
 1990    28.9   4.7   3.6 
 1991    84.4  59.1  45.2 
 1992    25.6  10.8   9.3 
 1993    47.8   9.1  23.4 
 1994    19.8  -1.2   9.4 
 1995    42.0  33.8  27.1 
 1996    18.1  31.7  43.7 
 1997    38.8  44.7  69.6 
  
 CAGR    37.9% 21.2% 30.6% 
 Sharpe   1.676 0.839 1.166 
 

There is a saving grace for the PSR strategy (using VL #1 & #2). By combining it in a 50/50 mix with the pure RS strategy, we can smooth out the market's cycling back and forth between growth and value approaches and produce the highest reward/risk ratio ever posted.

To put it a different way, the 50/50 mix would have quadrupled your investment since January of 1995!

50% 26 Week RS (#2-#6) and 50% PSR1&2 (#2-#6) 
  
 1989     53.2 
 1990     19.0 
 1991     84.4 
 1992     15.4 
 1993     41.2 
 1994     29.0 
 1995     51.3 
 1996     48.0 
 1997     74.3 
       
 CAGR            44.6% 
 Sharpe Ratio     1.766 
 

Not bad for a low-maintenance strategy and a 12-month holding period!

Good fortune to all -- Jim Lynn

[Robert Sheard is the author of the forthcoming book, The Unemotional Investor, due out from Simon & Schuster on May 12. To pre-order your copy, please visit Amazon.com, where it's available at a discounted price.]