The Daily Workshop Report
by Robert Sheard (TMF Sheard)

LEXINGTON, KY. (October 15, 1997)

Scroll to the bottom for year-to-date Growth and Value Screen results.

It's Large-cap Week here in the Foolish Workshop. On Monday, I listed the 100 largest American stocks. Yesterday I summarized the Bits and Bytes Portfolio, a large-cap portfolio of computer and computer-related stocks. Today, we turn our attention to a high-yield approach using these giants. No, it's not the Dow Dividend Approach, but rather, its cousin, Beating the S&P.

Ethan Haskel, a Baltimore cardiologist and long-time Fool better known in Cyberspace as [email protected], decided he liked the Foolish Four approach, but wanted some diversification. One option, of course, is simply to include more of the high-yielding Dow stocks, but as our long-term history shows, doing so sacrifices a healthy chunk of performance returns in exchange for the extra diversification. While the Foolish Four has returned nearly 23% a year since 1971, the High-Yield Ten has returned less than 18%.

Dr. Haskel decided to look elsewhere, using the basic Dow Dividend methodology. In other words, he sought to expand the field to other American large-cap industrials which offered good yields. The companies in the Dow aren't the only large-cap, high-yielding giants in the American market. In fact, because the Dow is limited to 30 stocks, there are a number of larger industrials not represented in the index. Beating the S&P looks to add these stocks so as to complement the Foolish Four without sacrificing performance.

To select the field of thirty stocks, Beating the S&P gets a list of the largest companies in America. From there, it removes the Dow stocks so as not to repeat them. Then Cormend selects the next thirty large-cap dividend-paying industrials, throwing out stocks only if they would over-weight a single industry (such as oil stocks).

At the time he first began developing this approach, Dr. Haskel didn't have electronic access to large-cap screens, so he used the annual rankings published in one of those glossy financial magazines to generate the list of thirty stocks each year. Now that we can screen updated rankings electronically each week if we like, the process has become much easier.

Another way to play this approach is to create your own "index" of thirty or forty stocks. Take the market-cap rankings I provided on Monday, throw out the utilities (I would even exclude the telephone companies) and any stocks that don't pay a dividend and then take the top thirty or forty stocks. Using the list I posted Monday, for example, this would include the following stocks:

General Electric  GE
Exxon Corp.  XON
Coca-Cola  KO
Intel Corp.  INTC
Merck & Co.  MRK
Int'l Business Mach.  IBM
Philip Morris  MO
Procter & Gamble  PG
Bristol-Myers Squibb  BMY
Pfizer  Inc.  PFE
Johnson & Johnson  JNJ
Wal-Mart Stores  WMT
Amer. Int'l Group  AIG
Lilly (Eli)  LLY
Hewlett-Packard  HWP
Du Pont  DD
Citicorp  CCI
Mobil Corp.  MOB
PepsiCo  Inc.  PEP
Ford Motor  F
Chevron Corp.  CHV
Disney (Walt)  DIS
BankAmerica Corp.  BAC
Lucent Technologies  LU
Boeing  BA
Chase Manhattan Corp.  CMB
Abbott Labs.  ABT
Fannie Mae  FNM
Gen'l Motors  GM
Gillette  G
Amer. Home Products  AHP
Amoco Corp.  AN
NationsBank Corp.  NB
Travelers Group  TRV
Motorola  Inc.  MOT
Schlumberger Ltd.  SLB
Schering-Plough  SGP
Minnesota Mining  MMM
Amer. Express  AXP
Home Depot  HD

The top ten yielders from this list (as of noon today) are:

Philip Morris   MO
Ford Motor   F
Amoco Corp.   AN
Gen'l Motors   GM
Mobil Corp.   MOB
Chevron Corp.   CHV
Exxon Corp.   XON
Amer. Home Products   AHP
Minnesota Mining   MMM
DuPont   DD

Obviously, four oil stocks are too many, so I would probably limit the field to two stocks of the ten from any one industry. So throw out Chevron and Exxon and add in the next two stocks, NationsBank and Chase Manhattan.

Philip Morris   MO
Ford Motor   F
Amoco Corp.   AN
Gen'l Motors   GM
Mobil Corp.   MOB
Amer. Home Products   AHP
Minnesota Mining   MMM
DuPont   DD
NationsBank Corp.  NB
Chase Manhattan Corp. CMB

If you wish to re-rank them by stock price as the Beating the Dow and Beating the S&P models do, the order would be:

Company Name       Symbol  Price   Div   Yield
Philip Morris          MO  41.38  1.60  3.87%
Ford Motor              F  49.50  1.68  3.39%
DuPont                 DD  58.75  1.26  2.14%
NationsBank Corp.      NB  63.50  1.32  2.08%
Gen'l Motors           GM  70.25  2.00  2.85%
Amer. Home Products   AHP  70.44  1.72  2.44%
Mobil Corp.           MOB  74.81  2.12  2.83%
Amoco Corp.            AN  94.38  2.80  2.97%
Minnesota Mining      MMM  98.44  2.12  2.15%
Chase Manhattan Corp. CMB 122.69  2.48  2.02%

There are a number of ways to use the high-yield strategy. As long as you're working with a group of large-cap industrials that pay dividends, you should do pretty well over the long run. Decide which of the many variations is right for you and Fool on!

Tomorrow and Friday we'll look at two large-cap strategies based on earnings and price momentum. Stay tuned.

Monthly Growth Screens
(Jan. 3 to present)
94.33%  Relative Strength  
42.09%  Investing for Growth  
38.60%  EPS Plus RS  
30.14%  YPEG Potential  
29.11%  S&P 500 Index  
28.88%  Unemotional Growth  
24.99%  Low Price/Sales  
24.89%  Formula 90  

Annual Value Screens
(Jan. 1 to present)
28.66%  Dow Combo  
27.46%  Dogs of the Dow  
27.31%  Unemotional Value  
27.31%  Beating the Dow  
24.96%  Dow Jones Ind Avg  
24.22%  Beating the S&P  
20.76%  Foolish Four