Welcome to the Motley Fool Shop at FoolMart Daily Dow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   


This Feature

Related Items

BTD 10
As Of 12/11/96


1. ATT
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:T)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:T)") end if %>

2. International Paper
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:IP)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:IP)") end if %>

3. General Motors
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:GM)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:GM)") end if %>

4. Chevron Corp
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:CHV)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:CHV)") end if %>

5. Minnesota Mining & Mfg
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:MMM)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:MMM)") end if %>

6. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:DD)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:DD)") end if %>

7. Exxon
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:XON)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:XON)") end if %>

8. J.P. Morgan
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:JPM)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:JPM)") end if %>

9. Texaco
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:TX)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:TX)") end if %>

10. Philip Morris
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:MO)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:MO)") end if %>

***NOTE: FOOLISH FOUR
STOCKS ARE ITALICISED

Last Update: 12/11/96

The Daily Dow
Wednesday, December 11, 1996
by Robert Sheard (MF DowMan)

LEXINGTON, Kentucky (December 11) -- A question that comes up occasionally and goes right to the heart of our Dow Dividend Approach concerns the second screen, the one based on a stock's price. Most people intuitively see the link between high yields and value, but why low price? Why not something else like low P/E?

Michael O'Higgins, author of Beating the Dow (available in our FoolMart store, incidentally), tested a myriad of variations and found that of all the criteria he tested, the simple high-yield test performed the best, better the P/E ratios, better than book value ratios, better than Price/Sales ratios, etc.

But within that group of ten highest yielders he noticed that the ones with the lowest stock prices performed better than the ones with the highest yields. And it hinges on something inherent in turn-around stocks, the assumption that they're going back up.

Given that we expect all ten stocks to go back up, how does one choose among those ten? Well, since we're buying out-of-favor stocks, we actually want volatility (since we're assuming it will be volatility to the upside). And in volatile stocks, the ones with the lowest prices get swept along more rapidly. It's much like white water. Put a small piece of balsa wood in a torrent and it gets swept along the surface at enormous speed. Put a big log in the torrent and it'll move quickly, but that lighter balsa chip will zoom past it.

Going back to stocks, look at a $20 stock versus a $100 stock. They both get caught up in strong market moves, but a similar dollar gain will affect the cheaper stock much more dramatically. A $2 move in the cheap stock is a 10% gain. The same $2 in the behemoth is only a 2% profit.

It doesn't work perfectly every time, of course, but on average the lower-priced stocks will out-perform the higher-priced issues in the high-yield group, enough so over the decades that it makes the approach consistently out-perform a straight high-yield model. For the year-by-year results of many variations, check out the 35-year database available in FoolMart.


Today's Dow Numbers
Stock  Change    Bid
-------------------
DD   -2  1/2   92.63
CHV  -   3/4   62.88
MMM  -1  1/4   83.13
EK   -   7/8   80.38
IMN  -   1/8   32.88
                   Day   Month    Year  History
        FOOL-4   -1.48%   0.75%  27.46%  27.46%
        DJIA     -1.09%  -1.83%  25.12%  25.12%
        S&P 500  -0.91%  -2.31%  20.26%  20.26%
        NASDAQ   -0.26%   1.28%  24.42%  24.42%

    Rec'd   #  Security     In At       Now    Change

   1/2/96  142 DuPont        69.88     92.63    32.56%
   1/2/96  149 3M            63.76     83.13    30.37%
  7/16/96   14 Imation       26.16     32.88    25.68%
   1/2/96  380 Chevron       52.38     62.88    20.05%
   1/2/96  148 E. Kodak      67.00     80.38    19.96%

    Rec'd   #  Security     In At     Value    Change

   1/2/96  380 Chevron    19902.50  23892.50  $3990.00
   1/2/96  142 DuPont      9922.25  13152.75  $3230.50
   1/2/96  149 3M          9500.09  12385.63  $2885.54
   1/2/96  148 E. Kodak    9916.00  11895.50  $1979.50
  7/16/96   14 Imation      366.21    460.25    $94.04

                             CASH   $1942.85
                            TOTAL  $63729.48



Transmitted: 12/11/96

      
      

 

<% end if end function %>
  home  | news  | specials  | strategies  | personal finance  | school  | help  

<% if request.querystring("source") = "yhoolnk" then referer = Request.ServerVariables("HTTP_REFERER") if referer = "" then referer = "http://finance.yahoo.com/" response.write "

<< Back to Yahoo!

" end if %> <% function YahooWelcome if gsCookieUsername = "" and request.querystring("source") = "yhoolnk" then %>

Welcome, Fool!

Be a Fool and get free, unlimited access to our site.

What we offer:
 • Take a tour
 • Daily News
 • Talk Stocks


© Copyright 1995-2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool. The Motley Fool is a registered trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us