Welcome to the Motley Fool Shop at FoolMart Daily Dow

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   


This Feature

Related Items

BTD 10
As Of 11/21/96


1. ATT
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:T)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:T)") end if %>

2. International Paper
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:IP)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:IP)") end if %>

3. General Motors
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:GM)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:GM)") end if %>

4. Chevron Corp
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:CHV)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:CHV)") end if %>

5. Minnesota Mining & Mfg
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:MMM)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:MMM)") end if %>

6. J.P. Morgan
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:JPM)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:JPM)") end if %>

7. Exxon
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:XON)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:XON)") end if %>

8. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:DD)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:DD)") end if %>

9. Texaco
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:TX)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:TX)") end if %>

10. Philip Morris
<% if gsSubBrand = "aolsnapshot" then Response.Write("
(NYSE:MO)") else Response.Write("(NYSE:MO)") end if %>

***NOTE: FOOLISH FOUR
STOCKS ARE ITALICISED

Last Update: 11/18/96

The Daily Dow
Thursday, November 21, 1996
by Robert Sheard (MF DowMan)

LEXINGTON, Kentucky (November 21) -- One of the things we do here at The Motley Fool is poke fun at the traditional financial media. Hey, we're Fools, that's what we do. But we're not stupid, and when the mainstream media does something right, it's only fair that we point that out too.

One of the best new things on AOL, in my opinion, is the Dow Jones Business Center. In that one area, you can get news stories from Dow Jones sources, analyst upgrades, and the typical news material one would expect from a company with lots of resources. (Hey, they can even list their news stories in chronological order, something AOL's Company News has yet to figure out!)

But my real goal today is to point you to an article by Vanessa O'Connell of The Wall Street Journal. Her column in the Money Matters section this morning is one I've been thinking about writing for a while, but she did a better job on it than I could have done, so I'll just summarize it here and point you to her article for the details.

The focus of her piece was on the archaic pricing structure in our markets where stocks are traded using fractions of a dollar instead of dollars and cents. It dates back to the Spanish coins in colonial days which were divided into eight "bits."

But the arguments for going away from this system to one that actually makes sense for those of us who've closed the calendar on the 18th and 19th centuries is that it would be too expensive to change over to a decimal system and that the market makers, the middlemen, would lose too much money.

As Ms. O'Connell's article points out, it's not so, and the real important factor is that switching to decimal pricing would narrow the spreads between the bid and the ask and save the individual investor a penny or more per share per trade. It doesn't sound like much until you realize that equates to more than $1.5 billion a year (based on last year's trading).

So, guess who's fighting it? Of course. Those who profit from the spread. In one of the most fallacious arguments I've heard for anything since I stopped teaching freshman writing, E.E. "Buzzy" Geduld, president of Herzog Heine Geduld (the largest wholesale market maker), theorized, "Communism sounded good too, until it became real." Helpful, huh?

But if the experience in Canada is any guide (the Toronto exchange switched to decimal pricing in April), such a switch would save individual investors a fortune, and because of increased trading volume, the market makers would still make their share. How Foolish! Don't look for it anytime soon, though. It makes too much sense (or cents).


Today's Dow Numbers
Stock  Change    Bid
-------------------
DD   +   1/8   92.75
CHV  -   1/4   67.00
MMM  +   1/2   83.38
EK   -1  1/4   82.50
IMN  -   3/4   30.75
                   Day   Month    Year  History
        FOOL-4   -0.30%   3.56%  31.01%  31.01%
        DJIA     -0.18%   6.45%  25.43%  25.43%
        S&P 500  -0.16%   5.31%  20.59%  20.59%
        NASDAQ   -0.54%   2.99%  19.57%  19.57%

    Rec'd   #  Security     In At       Now    Change

   1/2/96  142 DuPont        69.88     92.75    32.74%
   1/2/96  149 3M            63.76     83.38    30.77%
   1/2/96  380 Chevron       52.38     67.00    27.92%
   1/2/96  148 E. Kodak      67.00     82.50    23.13%
  7/16/96   14 Imation       26.16     30.75    17.56%

    Rec'd   #  Security     In At     Value    Change

   1/2/96  380 Chevron    19902.50  25460.00  $5557.50
   1/2/96  142 DuPont      9922.25  13170.50  $3248.25
   1/2/96  149 3M          9500.09  12422.88  $2922.79
   1/2/96  148 E. Kodak    9916.00  12210.00  $2294.00
  7/16/96   14 Imation      366.21    430.50    $64.29

                             CASH   $1810.64
                            TOTAL  $65504.52



Transmitted: 11/21/96

      
      

 

<% end if end function %>
  home  | news  | specials  | strategies  | personal finance  | school  | help  

<% if request.querystring("source") = "yhoolnk" then referer = Request.ServerVariables("HTTP_REFERER") if referer = "" then referer = "http://finance.yahoo.com/" response.write "

<< Back to Yahoo!

" end if %> <% function YahooWelcome if gsCookieUsername = "" and request.querystring("source") = "yhoolnk" then %>

Welcome, Fool!

Be a Fool and get free, unlimited access to our site.

What we offer:
 • Take a tour
 • Daily News
 • Talk Stocks


© Copyright 1995-2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool. The Motley Fool is a registered trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us